|
PRO-ACTIVE 005 (07/04/95)
IS RENO THE PLACE TO GAMBLE?
Lot's of people are interested in gambling. The idea of risking something to possibly garner a larger return is hard to resist for a number of Americans. Gamblers are found in nearly every segment of America, from the richest to the poorest, from Agnostics to the spiritually devout, and from civil servants to cultists.. I believe the primary elements that make gambling most interesting are the odds and the stakes. The odds are the gambling line which all bets are weighed and paid against. The stakes are what you are willing to risk. But I am not talking about money in this article. The odds are 666 to 1, and the stakes are the future of humanity.
Right now the biggest bets being laid down in America are by the New World Order (NWO) supporters who are gambling that middle America is too ignorant and apathetic to bother working against them. Out of this segment of population, the ones risking the greatest stakes are "the cultists". When seeing this word, thoughts are immediately conjured of men and women in dark robes, huddled in a smoke filled cave somewhere. Well friend, you have got it completely wrong. If you want to place a bet on what President believes, you might look toward the Attorney General, another hand picked employee of Bill Clinton. Since the U.S. Justice department allocates funds for investigations and infiltration into cults, we should bet that she knows exactly what a cultist is. Here is a quote from Ms. Reno’s justice department that clearly spells out the stakes involved in defining this important issue.
"A cultist is one who has a strong belief in the Bible and the Second Coming of Christ; who frequently attends Bible studies; who has a high level of financial giving to Christian causes; who home schools his children; who has accumulated survival foods and has a strong belief in the 2nd Amendment; and who distrusts big government."
US Justice Department
Are you one of Bill Clinton and Janet Reno's cultists? When the Waco tragedy was finished, Janet Reno boldly stated, "I take full responsibility." This was certainly no admonition of guilt, but was perhaps a statement from Ms. Reno refiguring the odds and stakes for CFR stooge Bill Clinton's NWO America, and you are the chip.
America is currently nothing more than a NWO casino. All the games are rigged, and two of the chief pit bosses are Bill Clinton and Janet Reno. All payoffs are in NWO dollars which are worthless. The only way to win this game is not to play. Bill Clinton and Janet Reno must go. Write letters to the new incoming representatives urging them to abandon "business as usual" tactics and investigate Whitewater and Waco. As a result, I believe both Clintons and Janet Reno should then face imprisonment on charges for hundreds of violations of the law. Sit down are write your letter now. Get on the phone if you don't know who to write to and find out. It isn't hard to do, and no gamble is worth the risk of losing our families and country any further than we have. Quit playing their game.
PRO-ACTIVE 006 (01/09/96)
And the Beat goes on.....
What beat am I talking about? I am speaking of Clinton damage control, the mainstream media machine, and how it continues to pound out a melody that is completely dissident to an increasingly tuned in America. The instruments of the NWO orchestra are once again being played by the media and the federal justice (contradiction of terms) system. Here is an article the by Los Angeles Times Staff Writer, David G. Savage (Dated 12/29/94). This article is word per word, with only the numbers on the far left being inserted for later reference:
Judge Rules Paula Jones Suit Will Have to Wait
Courts: Lawyers do get OK to question President Clinton and others in the potentially explosive claim of sexual harassment.
Washington In a split decision involving a potentially explosive sexual harassment lawsuit against the President, a federal judge in Little Rock, Ark., agreed Wednesday to delay a trial in the case until after Bill Clinton leaves office. But the judge also gave lawyers permission to question Clinton and others under oath about Paula Corbin Jones' claim that Clinton, while governor of Arkansas, made crude sexual advances to her in a Little Rock hotel room.
1. Those sworn statements about the case, if made public or leaked to the press, could embarrass and damage the already embattled President prior to the 1996 election.
2. Clinton's highprofile lawyer, Robert S. Bennett, has sought to get the case thrown out of court, or at least to have it put on hold indefinitely. Bennett's office said he was out of the country Wednesday and was unavailable to comment. But Carl S. Rauh, an attorney working with Bennett, said they would appeal the Judge's ruling that allows the discovery process to proceed.
3. "We are concerned about this being a distraction for the President," Rauh said. Experts familiar with sexual harassment cases said that the depositions involving Clinton and others who witnessed his alleged actions could prove embarrassing.
4. They predicted that Bennett would probably see a court order sealing all the depositions. They could also delay matters further by successively appealing Wednesday's ruling to a higher court. A lawyer for Jones said that he was "gratified" by the 22page opinion issued by U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright.
5. "The court has agreed with our position that the President does not enjoy immunity from these kinds of lawsuits," said Joseph Cammarata of Fairfax, Va. "We have a lot of people to depose, and the court has said, 'Let's get the process going.' "
6. The ruling cuts a middle course in addressing the previously unresolved question of whether a sitting President can be dragged into court to fight a damage suit involving a private matter.
7. In 1982, the Supreme Court gave the President "absolute immunity" from being sued over his "official actions." But the justices have not spoken on claims involving the President's private conduct or matters that took place before he was elected. Jones, a lowlevel Arkansas state employee, said she was escorted to meet the governor in his hotel room on May 8, 1991, about 18 months before Clinton was elected President.
8. But she waited until May 6, 1994, to file a damage suit against himin hopes, she said, of clearing her name over rumors that she had been intimately involved with Clinton. Responding to the lawsuit, Bennett claimed the President was entitled to absolute immunity from such damage claims. Judge Wright, an appointee of former President George Bush, disagreed.
9. "No one, be he a king or a President, is above the law," she wrote in the opinion. However, the chief executive is due a "temporary or limited immunity" from under going a trial during his term of office, she added, because it would inevitably distract him from his official duties. "Although President Clinton is not entitled to have this action dismissed on the basis of immunity, he should not have to devote his time and effort to the defense of this case at trial while in office," she wrote. The preparation for a Trial can move forward, she said. "There would seem to be no reason why the discovery and deposition process could not proceed as to all persons, including the President himself," she wrote.
10. State trooper Danny Ferguson remains a key figure in the case. Jones also sued Ferguson because he allegedly escorted her to the hotel room. On Wednesday, Wright said the two suits are so intertwined that they must proceed together. This clears the way for Ferguson to be questioned under oath about whether he indeed took the young woman to meet Clinton in his hotel room.
11. Zachary Fasman, a Washington lawyer who handles job discrimination cases, said the judge's ruling allowing discovery to proceed is a big victory for Jones and poses a potential problem for the President.
12. "I would assume they [Clinton's lawyers] will seek a protective order keeping these depositions under seal. This a sensitive case and judges usually grant those orders," he said. "but the problem is that those orders are hard to enforce. You can try to seal it, but it doesn't always work."
==============================
I had an extremely liberal acquaintance call me about this article, pointing out what a victory this must be for the republican party. I made pretty much the same points to him on the phone as I did with the following analysis. It motivated me to put together an antipropaganda piece that may be used to motivate and activate interested parties..
Propaganda Exposed
Let's go down the line and examine the sections I numbered;
1. Those sworn statements about the case, if made public or leaked to the press, could embarrass and damage the already embattled President prior to the 1996 election.
The members of the press have shown no mercy to republican or conservatives, or even many criminal cases when they print stuff that is "leaked to the press". This involves no leak, but for a fact I know nearly every media department in the United States has already received many irrefutable facts on such stories as Waco, the Gordon Kahl case, the Byron Dale case, the Bill Benson case, the Paul Jones case, etc....
Fax on demand organizations pepper legal and media departments with alternative source information which reach from simply raising questions about lucidly clear "inconsistencies" in government press releases, to offering proof of the totalitarian NWO orders to subjugate America and her peoples. Let us move on....
2. Clinton's highprofile lawyer, Robert S. Bennett, has sought to get the case thrown out of court, or at least to have it put on hold indefinitely. Bennett's office said he was out of the country Wednesday and was unavailable to comment.
Once again, only public outrage and reaction is ever going to change the oft repeated tactics we are seeing played out in section 2. Plain and simple, your letters and phone calls go largely unrecognized and unreacted to. We have new people in office, but they may only BAU (business as usual) to the New World Order. It is past time to seriously consider going with third party candidates, and most of these will be conservative Christians we have a better chance of trusting. Will the government move to bar conservative Christians from office? The media is sure working toward that...
3. "We are concerned about this being a distraction for the President," Rauh said. Experts familiar with sexual harassment cases said that the depositions involving Clinton and others who witnessed his alleged actions could prove embarrassing.
Was the ACLU or the press concerned about embarrassing President Nixon during Watergate, or focusing on every single little event of question in Dan Quayles VicePresidency? What in the world are they talking about? They should be more concerned about where Clinton is taking us than embarrassing him.
4. They predicted that Bennett would probably seek a court order sealing all the depositions. They could also delay matters further by successively appealing Wednesday's ruling to a higher court.
Our legal system has degenerated to the point where the power elite can simply "buy delays" at the cost of further destroying out nations remaining integrity. Meanwhile, Clinton drives the American vehicle further down to a destination where American's will pay a toll of the surrendering of all of our remaining rights.
5. "The court has agreed with our position that the President does not enjoy immunity from these kinds of lawsuits," said Joseph Cammarata of Fairfax, Va. "We have a lot of people to depose, and the court has said, 'Let's get the process going.' "
I am more than curious as to the entire contents of the 22 page opinion from Judge Wright, and would like to know whether or not Joseph Cammarata was quoted out of context. Please, if you are a person who has a copy of the 22 page opinion, could I have a copy? To have this type of summarization from Mr. Cammarata about a 22 page opinion book smells to me like perhaps Mr. Cammarata may have said more, and we only got the NWO version of a "Readers Digest" condensation.
6. The ruling cuts a middle course in addressing the previously unresolved question of whether a sitting President can be dragged into court to fight a damage suit involving a private matter.
Section six can be answered shortly and sweetly by asking if Americans would knowingly elect a candidate to the presidency who was guilty of murder, contract murder, treason, financial impropriety, philandering, adultery, and perjury. If there is even a minute possibility of truth in the incredible mass of information of such allegations against Clinton, the guy should be brought under investigation immediately. Most people know the press would insist on charges being brought forth if the President were a conservative patriotic, nonNWO Christian.
7. In 1982, the Supreme Court gave the President "absolute immunity" from being sued over his "official actions." But the justices have not spoken on claims involving the President's private conduct or matters that took place before he was elected. Jones, a lowlevel Arkansas state employee, said she was escorted to meet the governor in his hotel room on May 8, 1991, about 18 months before Clinton was elected President.
Why does any "citizen of the United States" have complete immunity to the law? Whether this is private or public, commit the crime and do the time! The CFR agenda has always been to remove the power elite from the law, and this is a clear indicator they have exceeded to a large extent. Let us take our rights back!
8. But she waited until May 6, 1994, to file a damage suit against himin hopes, she said, of clearing her name over rumors that she had been intimately involved with Clinton. Responding to the lawsuit, Bennett claimed the President was entitled to absolute immunity from such damage claims.
The Times writer intimates that this was merely a political ploy by Paula Jones. Well, it was not Paula Jones but David Brock, a writer for The American Spectator who brought this to the publics eye, and he was writing about a trooper (Danny Ferguson) who was moved to share his account of a potential president's promiscuity. Note to the L.A. Times and David Savage: Try printing the truth. Your circulation would probably increase, and your integrity certainly would. Up is the only direction for your integrity to go.....
9. "No one, be he a king or a President, is above the law," she wrote in the opinion. However, the chief executive is due a "temporary or limited immunity" from under going a trial during his term of office, she added, because it would inevitably distract him from his official duties. "Although President Clinton is not entitled to have this action dismissed on the basis of immunity, he should not have to devote his time and effort to the defense of this case at trial while in office," she wrote. The preparation for a Trial can move forward, she said. "There would seem to be no reason why the discovery and deposition process could not proceed as to all persons, including the President himself," she wrote.
On point nine, I would like to agree. He should not face personal charges while in office. There is more than enough evidence to impeach him. Yank him from office, sue and imprison him before the CFR and NWO leaders have him "removed from life." Bill Clinton may have a story to tell someday, and I know they won't want their favorite puppets nose to stop growing!
10. State trooper Danny Ferguson remains a key figure in the case. Jones also sued Ferguson because he allegedly escorted her to the hotel room. On Wednesday, Wright said the two suits are so intertwined that they must proceed together. This clears the way for Ferguson to be questioned under oath about whether he indeed took the young woman to meet Clinton in his hotel room.
Where is the National Organization of Women (NOW) on this issue? I was trying to figure why they haven't come to the rescue of a potentially sexually discriminated woman. After all, they sure went to bat for Anita Hill against the conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, of which it is likely there was not a fraction of truth involved in Ms. Hill's story. But I figured out why they are busy. They are probably trying to still go after Michael Douglas, who was employed to play the part of a man being sexually harassed by his female boss. Now, that is a much more worthy project! (gag, choke, moan......) After all, Michael Douglas is guilty of acting!
11. Zachary Fasman, a Washington lawyer who handles job discrimination cases, said the judge's ruling allowing discovery to proceed is a big victory for Jones and poses a potential problem for the President.
Potential problem is an understatement. Mr. PResident cannot afford to let his handsome, boyish, Kennedylike image be tarnished. God forbid he be found guilty of perversity after all he has done to reinforce America's traditional values system. And can I sell you a timeshare lakeside condo on the Moon?
12. "I would assume they [Clinton's lawyers] will seek a protective order keeping these depositions under seal. This a sensitive case and judges usually grant those orders," he said. "but the problem is that those orders are
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRO-ACTIVE 007 (01/31/96)
Ending Violence and Abortion
As much as I abhor what goes on unseen in the womb during abortion, I am not in favor of killing the perpetrators of abortion as an "option to end abortion." This merely provides the "establishment media" with ammunition in which to further promote their antiChristian agenda. But I understand the extreme frustration levels existing in the prolife movement, due to what I believe is the nearly complete lack of integrity and responsive journalism exercised by the "establishment media" in breaking stories on controversial Christian issues, especially abortion.
There is a simple way to end this issue, and that is to let the American public decide the issue. Lobbying interests and prejudicial socioeconomic arrangements exist between proabortion interests and everyone from legislators to Bill and Hillary Clinton. This is a moral issue of such percussive nature that it can only truly be decided in the homes of each and every American, and away from a centralized NWO agendabiased government.
What I suggest is a setting a time period ranging from perhaps a week or more in which network television would set aside time to show a number of prolife and proabortion films supplied by key members from all aspects of each those causes.
Members of both causes can work with each other enough to block out viewing time on network television, and then implement a system of alternating a prolife video with a proabortion video, equal time allowed for both, and letting each and every informed and educated American vote for him or herself. I would guarantee after at least one week, the American people would have plenty to say on the subject.
Proabortionists say they are supporting the rights of the woman to do what she desires with her own body, and the yet-to-be born life within it. Many Christians believe abortion is the reinstitution of child sacrifice, and the unborn child is being murdered. These two diverse viewpoints will bring continue to clash, despite the media being proabortion, until the public finally makes an educated, informed decision.
Now I doubt that any single member of the establishment media will be in favor of this, for their weak position for promoting abortion lies strictly on the ignorance of the American public. I know this is true, after being formerly proabortion, and having a change of heart after seeing what really goes on during an abortion. The people need to make this decision and not liberal hand appointed legislators who are often bought and sold. Come on members of the press, pick up the gauntlet and accept the challenge, or do you only fight with propaganda and rhetoric? Is true merely another four letter word to the press?
Some of the PA letters are missing. We hope to recover them soon...
PRO-ACTIVE 023 (02/06/96)
On account of quiet pastors? Sshhhhh!
01) Are there several hundred thousand United Nations troops in America?
02) Have biochemical agents been introduced into the cultures like Africa which have caused incredible devastations? And has that, or could that happen in our own country?
03) Do we have a President who can easily dismiss the phenomenal numbers of close personal contacts that have died under a plethora of mysterious circumstances.?
04) Is there a New World Order (George Bush thought so) and are the people of America being led directly into it?
05) Is it just coincidence that tens of thousands of Desert Storm veterans are not only coming down with ARS (Aids Related Symptoms) and are being denied support by a government who promised to "make it right" for any who suffered job difficulties during their activation?
06) Has America been in a state of national emergency since 1933 (War Powers Act (then)now, Peace Powers Act) validating numerous unconstitutional executive orders depriving Americans of basic freedoms and rights?
07) Do American tax dollars go toward supporting cannibalism in China, along with abortion throughout the world?
08) In paying over 2/3's of United Nations expenses, have Americans been endorsing genocidal and criminal actions of the United Nations against freedom loving peoples across the face of the earth?
09) Is it against the law to have over 30 days worth of food stored for your family?
10) Has almost every single HIV+ person who took AZT (FDA approved AIDS medicine) eventually died from AIDS?
11) Is the Federal Reserve a private organization and not an official department of the US Government?
12) Were the records from Waco and Whitewater mysteriously transferred to the Murrah building in Oklahoma just days before the explosion, despite Kenneth Starr demanding all Whitewater material be rendered to him?
13) Can it be that only five men own and control the 85 major newspapers in our country, and the three major television networks? And if so, wouldn't it indicate the potential for tyrannical censorship and abuse?
14) When the voting records of each state capital were personally checked, is it possible that the 16th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States was never ratified, in fact not even close to passing?
If the answer to even one of these questions is correct, then the variables regarding the future of America bode dire portents indeed. Dear God in heaven, can it be there is a nation of Americans so ignorant and arrogant as to not even explore the potentials and dynamics of even one of these questions? How long can it be before Your hand of judgment will swiftly descend upon the multitudes of this nation, as too many of us passively/mutely wait for the rapture?
The pulpits of America are where the answers to these questions could be best answered and offered, for our strengths could be multiplied and best delegated. Too many pastors are running scared and prefer self imposed ignorance and comfort to partaking in the steadfastness of exercising the duties of stewardship our Lord God gave us. Winning souls is imperative in true Christian faith. But many of the current lost see us as the greatest of hypocrites for not standing up to hold this country together, or at least to make the effort in the name of Jesus.
IGNORANCE AND ARROGANCE ARE CLOSE COUSINS, BUT ARE NOT A FAMILY TO BE PART OF...
PRO-ACTIVE 025 (02/09/96)
Jesus wasn't political, was he?
Would Jesus be involved in politics today? It is an interesting question that is becoming a key issue during these challenging and turbulent times.
To my own chagrin through personal research, it appears the overwhelming amount of ministries today claim that as Christians, we are not to be involved in politics. When I challenge pastors and ministerial leaders to get active, the oft repeated question I hear from many pastors and lay people is, "well Jesus wasn't political was he?"
We are going to "briefly examine" the Gospel of Matthew, just one of the writings in which the earthly life of Jesus is focused on. I am going to show you a handful of Scriptures from Matthew, along with the entire 23rd chapter of Matthew in which there is little or no place in which Jesus is not berating the Saduccees, the Pharisees, and the Scribes. In fact, the 23rd chapter is a most powerful indictment to move pastors and lay people alike to vocally express their displeasure at our leaders and their ungodly policies.
To best understand the parallels between 20 centuries past and today, please read the next two paragraphs.
In the Hebrew system during the time of Jesus, the religious leaders were also the political leaders. Today, with the homage being paid to mother earth and environment, we are seeing the same type of spirituality/politics being repeated. I have little doubt that this was also the system of Babylon the Great, which is predicted to rise again.
The scribes were the reporters of that day, who wholeheartedly followed around the Saduccees and Pharisees eagerly jotting down their prattle, just as the media and journalist of this day help to promote the prattle (socialist agenda) of today's politicians. Both groups were and are basically "ministers of propaganda".
Matt 3:7 But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come? (KJV)
It is the duty of God's people point out the sinful misdeeds of our leaders, as well as the consequences.
Matt 12:14 Then the Pharisees went out, and held a council against him, how they might destroy him. (KJV)
The UN, CFR, and Trilateral Commissions all exhort their policingagencies about the dangers of monotheism. The Waco massacre along with numerous other violations of human rights illustrate they are plotting to destroy any who do not embrace their own agenda.
Matt 15:12 Then came his disciples, and said unto him, Knowest thou that the Pharisees were offended, after they heard this saying? (KJV)
Jesus spoke boldly knowing the politicians would be offended
Matt 16:13 1 The Pharisees also with the Sadducees came, and tempting desired him that he would shew them a sign from heaven. 2 He answered and said unto them, When it is evening, ye say, It will be fair weather: for the sky is red. 3 And in the morning, It will be foul weather to day: for the sky is red and lowring. O ye hypocrites, ye can discern the face of the sky; but can ye not discern the signs of the times? (KJV)
Matt 16:11 11 How is it that ye do not understand that I spake it not to you concerning bread, that ye should beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees? (KJV)
In the Bible, Leaven is representative of sin. Our leaders are to be persons of good morals.
Matt 16:12 12 Then understood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees. (KJV)
Jesus was warning the people of the dangers of following the doctrines of unwise leaders.
Here are some absolutely scathing indictments against religious and political leaders, and the speaker was none other than Jesus Christ.
(These are all from the 23rd chapter of Matthew)
13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.
14 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretense make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.
15 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.
16 Woe unto you, ye blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor!
17 Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gold, or the temple that sanctifieth the gold?
18 And, Whosoever shall swear by the altar, it is nothing; but whosoever sweareth by the gift that is upon it, he is guilty.
19 Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gift, or the altar that sanctifieth the gift?
20 Whoso therefore shall swear by the altar, sweareth by it, and by all things thereon.
21 And whoso shall swear by the temple, sweareth by it, and by him that dwelleth therein.
23 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.
24 Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel.
26 Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also.
27 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness.
28 Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.
29 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous,
Chapter 23 does not need elaboration. Truth is simply truth....
And let us not forget, as the focus of this piece seemed aimed at political leaders, these men were both political and religious leaders. It is past time to call a nation of lukewarm pastors to accountability as well.
For every person that claims to be a Christian, there seems to be little doubt as to the best way to run our lives. And that way is to follow in the footsteps of Jesus. Jesus walked in love, truth, sacrifice and boldness. It was only the bold selfless sacrifice that enabled the followers of Jesus to inherit the Kingdom of God. Shouldn't we practice the same methods, and take the same steps that Jesus did?
If the blind are following the blind, might not that blindness be borne of a spiritual darkness. Can it be that if we shed the light of Jesus, that the blind could see the pathway they need to take and repent of their evil?
For all you pastors and church leaders who have not taught your people to be active in addressing the woes of this world, I urge you to exhort your congregations to phone and write letters to our congressional leaders. Often it is hard to be truthful, and love can sometimes be very tough. But as the true and loving parent admonishes their child when they do wrong, we carry the same burden and responsibility to admonish our brothers and sisters as well as out leaders to remain steadfast and firm in the ways of the Lord. That is certainly what Jesus did unto point of death....
Jesus Christ died on the cross to liberate mankind. Shouldn't we live free to honor that sacrifice?
PRO-ACTIVE 025 (02/12/96)
Freedom receives a Mortal Blow
Without shame, without apology, and without reserve, I wept this day. I wept for the future of our children.
I watched as self serving, ignorant, and spineless politicians hammered spikes into the outstretched hands and feet of this formerly great country. They accomplished this through the passage of SR390, the omnibus antiterrorism bill.
President Clinton complained that militias and right wing Christians were capitalizing on the atrocity in Oklahoma to promote their agenda. But, atypical of other antiChristian socialist sympathizers, the President was merely making this point to hide the fact that through the Oklahoma tragedy, he had the sorriest opportunity ever presented to rip our constitution into even smaller pieces than he has done so far.....
And your elected "unrepresentatives" known as U.S. Senators fell in line with Clinton's socialist agenda.
What will it take for this nation of lazy, apathetic, and dumbed down peoples to look past the end of their noses to see what is on the horizon? This antiterrorism bill is a replica of legislation passed in NAZI GERMANY, as an apathetic and lazy minded German people stood by and watched as journalists, trade unionists, gypsies and jews were lined up and marched to the death camps. Perhaps as many as 6,000,000 people died there...
China and the former USSR murdered as many as 200,000,000 people under similar legislation which made it a crime to speak out against injustice. The people there also practiced gun control and had no rights to protect them, just as we are seeing the same agenda further implemented in the formerly great country. President Lincoln once said, this land is consecrated in blood far beyond our capacity to add to or detract from. I guess he did not know the extent of apathetic indifference that would someday permeate the character of America's people....
As you sit in your home, and hear your neighbors door being bashed in for exercising freedom of speech, just close your windows, close your heart, and close your mind. Reassure your family, that THANK GOD IT IS NOT US THEY ARE COMING AFTER......yet.
Oh ye lukewarm collection of yes men, and ignorant slaves of apathy. How long before God judges you and this nation for our lack of concern? I guess as long as it is your neighbor and not you, it is fine with you....
Call your congressional representatives and demand they vote down HR 896. Do it for your children, do it now!
There is no copyright on this material, for it is simply God's truth. Please copy and fax this in His holy name.
PRO-ACTIVE 026 (02/13/95)
A Call to Accountability and Reason
Dear Sir or ma'am,
I understand that you are a member of a committee that has been picked to investigate the terrible and poorly handled event that occurred at the Mount Carmel compound of David Koresh in Waco Texas. I wish to point out a few things before you proceed:
There have been numerous abuses committed by our government under terroristic policies that have been greatly magnified through the current administration led by President Bill Clinton. These abuses have included the beating and seizure of property performed on Byron Dale, the unjust incarceration and "accidentalyearlong 100 fold" drugging of Bill Benson, the mutilation and death of Christian Patriot Gordon Kahl, and the murder of Vicky Weaver (shot in the face while nursing her baby) along with her 14 year old son. There are many more of these type of indiscreet "small scale" violations, far too numerous to list here. That is why I chose the most prominent.
The culmination of these terrible abuses to that point in time though, culminate through the poorly executed and terrible mishandling of the people on David Koresh's Branch Davidian compound. I do not personally endorse all of David Koresh's views of scripture, but the facts are that it was the gross and criminal misuse of soundbytes taken from the BBC's interview with Koresh that prompted the headlines in "every major newspaper" in this country to state, "KORESH CLAIMS TO BE JESUS."
Through the most basic studies of criminology and the application of the most simplistic common sense, you do not destroy the scene of a crime, especially with the massive amounts of controversy and misinformation which has been at the least, tacitly endorsed by the United States Government's agenda oriented main stream news media. And yet the agenda for potential coverup of events like the bombing of the Murrah building in Oklahoma was established as US Government policy through the swift burial and destruction of evidence at the Mount Carmel compound. The swift bulldozing was either a gross mistake, or the culmination of a blatantly heinous agenda.
If you truly care about the people of this country, if you are not already throwing in the towel on the future of this country, if you do not already have a position solidified for yourselves in the New World Order, and if you possess a shread of conscience, and I implore you to look past the end of your noses and the biased information offered by the media. Please view the various Waco videos and reports available on the subject, please seek truth, please remember your oath of office is to be of service to the people of America, so I implore you, SERVE US!
If you seek the truth through honest and competant investigation, you may come to the conclusion the millions of Americans have, and that conclusion is that at the very least, the Waco tragedy was woefully mishandled. Beyond that conclusion, God help this country. Please look at this event with eyes to see truth, and an open heart.
PRO-ACTIVE 027 (03/17/96)
Big Sellout not on Business Pages
As many of us should remember from the November elections, there was an overwhelming Republican victory throughout this country. The people of America registered their extreme displeasure at the liberal socialist agenda being promoted through the democratic platform. That vote stated clearly, ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
Many of us feel however, that it is still business as usual. Aside from a number of refreshing and worthy freshmen in the House of Representatives, we have not seen a "changing of the guard," as much as we have seen a "changing of the garb." Many of the people elected merely changed clothes, but are carrying out the same socialist agenda.
California should have finally seen the political end of socialist minded Willie Brown, who has been the source of grievous damage to this state through his fourteen year tenure. But before the last vote for the California Speaker of the House, a Republican sold out and switched parties casting the decisive vote to bring back Willie Brown as cospeaker of the House. I feel that it was in the light of recent investigations into possible illegal tactics used by that "Republicrat swap" that Willie Brown stepped down, and handed the reins to "republican" Doris Allen. But was this just some more of "business as usual" republicrat nonsense? IT SURE WAS...
Doris Allen immediately paid homage to the Draconian socialists by firing nine staunch, conservative republican staff members, and more sure to follow. While this was going on, she blatantly lied about the layoffs to the press and her constituents. Of course, she did keep Willie Browns staff members. Was this a political payoff?
Perhaps she was just following the steps of a mentor like Dick Gregory, previous President of the California Republican Assembly. When Austin Miles (Pastor of First Charismatic Church International) was asked to give a prayer invocation in Concord, here was the response of Mr. Dick Gregory. He jumped to his feet and yelled, "This is NOT a Christian organization, it is a POLITICAL organization. It is for Muslems, humanists and ATHEISTS, it is NOT a Christian organization! " And he continued for sometime with his antiChristian tirade.
Allen Keyes, another republican political hopeful for the Presidential nomination was recently interviewed by Pastor Miles. When asked if he would get us out of the United Nations., he replied, "No, the U.N. servers a purpose. It is bascially a good thing." These antiChristian statements are documented, and I will either send it (send SASE), or fax it to interested parties. Or are you willing to stand up against Satan and the New World Order. I hope so.....
It is time to hold recall elections for people like Doris Allen, and it is past time to copy and share materials like these to get the message out. If you care about this country, you had best vote for outspoken, proven and forthright Christians lest we continue to hand America to New World Order socialists. Call or write to receive recall petitions.
|
